Autonomous and automated systems are already operating in shared environments—often faster than the infrastructure meant to understand, explain, or prepare for them.
The Public Automation Readiness Brief invites leaders who will ultimately bear responsibility—across cities, campuses, insurers, infrastructure operators, and system builders—to contribute insight before incidents or regulation force reactive decisions.
Your participation helps establish:
This is not a procurement, a policy mandate, or a sales process. It is an opportunity to shape readiness early, when influence still matters.
Purpose: Establish ground truth before decisions are made.
Environment Readiness Mapping
What it is:
A structured inventory of where autonomous and automated systems operate—or are expected to operate—across public and shared environments.
Why it matters:
Most environments do not have a clear picture of current exposure. Readiness begins with knowing what exists.
Responsibility & Authority Mapping
What it is:
Identification of who is expected to respond, decide, or explain when systems behave unexpectedly—regardless of vendor ownership.
Why it matters:
Responsibility often exists without authority. This gap defines early risk.
Readiness Gap Identification Tools
What it is:
Clear articulation of what is missing (visibility, coordination, data, authority) before expanded deployment occurs.
Why it matters:
You cannot fix what has not been named.
Purpose: Make system behavior legible and assess preparedness without blame.
System-Level Visibility
What it is:
A human-readable view of how autonomous and automated systems behave across conditions, environments, and infrastructure dependencies.
What it is:
Device-level logs do not translate into civic understanding. Visibility builds trust and prevents surprise.
Readiness Baseline
What it is:
A role-aware assessment of preparedness that avoids scoring, ranking, or blame, and instead highlights contextual readiness and gaps.
Why it matters:
Readiness is not binary. Understanding nuance enables responsible decisions before pressure forces them.
Structured Civic Reporting
What it is:
A formal channel for responsible stakeholders to log questions, anomalies, near-misses, and recurring issues into a shared record.
Why it matters:
Fragmented reporting delays response and erodes public confidence. Structure allows learning to compound.
Purpose: Enable expansion only under defined, testable conditions.
Product title
Aut aliquam et at quod. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Purpose: Establish ground truth before decisions are made.
Product title
Aut aliquam et at quod. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Purpose: Establish ground truth before decisions are made.
Product title
Aut aliquam et at quod. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
Product title
Product information, Lorem Ipsum. Fuga atque qui. Ullam facere quibusdam. Dolorem ut id. Eum ullam laborum et. Aliquam voluptate ut.
